For my Amazon review this month, I go the privilege (to me anyhow) to get a copy of Michael Palmer's last book, Resistant. This is the review I wrote for Amazon.
It was gut-wrenching for me to read this book of one of my
favorite medical-thriller authors. While I've had other favorites that
announced they would be retiring, none have ever died in the midst of a
brilliant writing career. I was fortunate enough to read and review one of his
other books that he sent me and also had several email exchanges, so in many
ways he felt like a personal friend. Michael died in October 2013 when he had
apparently finished most of this book, Resistant, and his family took it the
rest of the way to complete production. It is hard to think that I will never
get another new book of his to read. I tried to read this one slow to make the
moment last, but as with all his books I got caught up in the story and the
pace of the book and finished it way too soon.
This book was about a strain of bacteria that was resistant
(hence the title) to all normal forms of antibiotics and had been released by a
domestic terrorist group as a way to motivate the government to cancel out all
entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, food
stamps, etc. Of course many in the group lived in luxury so they felt a
different sort of entitlement. Dr. Lou Welcome, a recurring character in
Michael's last few books, becomes heavily involved for personal reasons in
trying find a cure for this bacteria that in Lou's words “turned the inside of
a body into liquid”, and not nice liquid. We are introduced to a new character
that Lou became great friends with named Humphrey Miller, a brilliant man with
the worst kind of cerebral palsy. I could see him in further recurring roles in
other books and the same with Lou's friend Cap whose life was changed forever
in this last book. Of course there will be no further books, but I could see that
the author would have already been plotting what kind of story he could pull
off with his characters next.
Besides introducing Humphrey to us and the difficulty he
faced as a man with so little control over his own body that people thought he
was an idiot, instead of a man whose IQ was probably completely off the charts.
Humphrey showed us that we need compassion and the will to treat people like
him as normal people. He also brought up
the necessity for the world to quit taking antibiotics for the common cold and
anything else that with time would cure itself. All of our overuse of
antibiotics as a people hasn't discouraged the germs but has only made them
tougher and harder to combat. If we aren't careful, we won't need a group of
terrorists to release them on us, we will be inviting them in through the front
door so to speak.
I enjoyed this book. I thought it was well written as usual
and moved along at a quick pace. It was the epitome of the type of books that
Michael Palmer wrote and wrote so well. It didn't disappoint.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One of the things I never do when writing reviews is read any review of the book before I write mine. Needless to say, I was stunned at the poor reviews this book received (I gave it 5 stars) most of the reviewers claiming it to be too liberal and political, boring and all sorts of other things but mostly hammering on the political leanings that they felt were in the book.
Writing a review for Amazon is like walking through a mind field, at least it is for me. If you give anything about the story away whether intentionally or not, you are jumped on for spoiling the story for the next one who might read it. One book that I read had it's entire story based on a wife whose husband had been working in a high paying career died suddenly and she was destitute and ended up having to go work on a farm. When I mentioned in my review that she should have filed for Social Security as a widow with dependents, I was jumped on with the oddest logic for why I was wrong to even think such a thing. Wishing I could make that little symbol for rolling eyes here!
So anyway, seeing all these reviews that kept talking about how political and liberal this book was, with of course, no actual examples in the ones I read, I put my mind thinking about it. Well, the whole concept of this book was based on a group of 100 people (neighbors) that thought they could 'fix' our country but only if they follow what these 100 decided was good and necessary. I saw no talk or implications of a political party, or being right winged or left. What I saw were a bunch of crazies that thought if they could undo many of the programs in our country, then the US would be as it should be thanks to these 100, but in the meantime they had no compunction in killing people if it furthered their agenda.
I thought the book was well written. I enjoyed it. I didn't find it 'political' in the sense the other reviewers did. I wish I had another of his books to read now, but know I will never again get a new one unless somehow I missed reading some of his earlier books. Thank you Michael Palmer for many hours of pure reading pleasure which for me is the only reason for reading a fiction book.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One of the things I never do when writing reviews is read any review of the book before I write mine. Needless to say, I was stunned at the poor reviews this book received (I gave it 5 stars) most of the reviewers claiming it to be too liberal and political, boring and all sorts of other things but mostly hammering on the political leanings that they felt were in the book.
Writing a review for Amazon is like walking through a mind field, at least it is for me. If you give anything about the story away whether intentionally or not, you are jumped on for spoiling the story for the next one who might read it. One book that I read had it's entire story based on a wife whose husband had been working in a high paying career died suddenly and she was destitute and ended up having to go work on a farm. When I mentioned in my review that she should have filed for Social Security as a widow with dependents, I was jumped on with the oddest logic for why I was wrong to even think such a thing. Wishing I could make that little symbol for rolling eyes here!
So anyway, seeing all these reviews that kept talking about how political and liberal this book was, with of course, no actual examples in the ones I read, I put my mind thinking about it. Well, the whole concept of this book was based on a group of 100 people (neighbors) that thought they could 'fix' our country but only if they follow what these 100 decided was good and necessary. I saw no talk or implications of a political party, or being right winged or left. What I saw were a bunch of crazies that thought if they could undo many of the programs in our country, then the US would be as it should be thanks to these 100, but in the meantime they had no compunction in killing people if it furthered their agenda.
I thought the book was well written. I enjoyed it. I didn't find it 'political' in the sense the other reviewers did. I wish I had another of his books to read now, but know I will never again get a new one unless somehow I missed reading some of his earlier books. Thank you Michael Palmer for many hours of pure reading pleasure which for me is the only reason for reading a fiction book.
